ScienceSoft vs Jabil Healthcare: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
ScienceSoft (3.9/5) edges ahead of Jabil Healthcare (3.8/5) overall. ScienceSoft is the better choice for SaMD and device software on a budget. Jabil Healthcare is the stronger option for global production capacity for cleared devices. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
ScienceSoft vs Jabil Healthcare: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | ScienceSoft | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1989 | 1966 |
| HQ | McKinney, TX, USA | St. Petersburg, FL, USA |
| Team size | 700–800 | ~20,000 (healthcare) |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Large, ISO 13485 certified software team with healthcare analytics and testing services | Global scale, supply chain and FDA-registered production for established medical device brands |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, time and materials, dedicated team | Manufacturing supply agreement, NPI contract |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | .NET, Java, iOS | Injection molding, Automated assembly, PCB assembly |
| Industries served | Digital health, Diagnostics & lab devices, Wearables & remote monitoring, Financial services | Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery, Wearables & remote monitoring, Consumer health |
ScienceSoft vs Jabil Healthcare: overview
ScienceSoft
Healthcare IT has been a ScienceSoft practice since 2005, inside a McKinney, Texas, software company that dates to 1989. The company holds ISO 13485:2016 certification for medical device software and SaMD, and it states experience preparing software for FDA clearance and CE marking (per company website; independently unverifiable). Its team is about 750. Its medical work is mostly software: SaMD, device companion apps, data analytics and medical device software testing.
Jabil Healthcare
Jabil Healthcare was formed in 2020 when Jabil combined its Nypro business with its orthopedics, spine and trauma units. At launch it had nearly 20,000 employees and more than 35 sites, and its factories producing finished medical devices are FDA registered. It covers minimally invasive devices, surgical robotics, complex catheters, diabetes care and consumer health, and the acquisition of CDMO Pii extended it into drug development and aseptic fill-finish. Jabil reported $8.3 billion in company-wide revenue for its second fiscal quarter of 2026.
Services and capabilities: ScienceSoft vs Jabil Healthcare
| Capability | ScienceSoft | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✗ | ✗ |
| SaMD & companion apps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connected devices & IoT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Industrial design & human factors | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mechanical engineering | ✗ | ✓ |
| Device cybersecurity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Regulatory & QMS support | ✗ | ✓ |
| Manufacturing & scale-up | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: ScienceSoft vs Jabil Healthcare
| Framework / platform | ScienceSoft | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C/C++ | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| Cloud (AWS/Azure) | ✓ | N/A |
| IEC 62304 | ✓ | N/A |
| ISO 14971 | N/A | N/A |
| ISO 13485 QMS | N/A | ✓ |
| Qt | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: ScienceSoft vs Jabil Healthcare
| Criterion | ScienceSoft | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time & materials | Manufacturing contract |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: ScienceSoft vs Jabil Healthcare
| Dimension | ScienceSoft | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Digital health, Diagnostics & lab devices, Wearables & remote monitoring | Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery, Wearables & remote monitoring |
| Best use cases | SaMD for clinical decision support, Mobile companion app for an existing device | Scaling production of a cleared diabetes device, Global manufacturing of a surgical robotics subsystem |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Manufacturing contract |
ScienceSoft vs Jabil Healthcare: pros and cons
| ScienceSoft | |
|---|---|
| + | ISO 13485 certification covers medical device software and SaMD |
| + | Large team can staff software projects quickly |
| + | Offers medical device software testing as a separate service |
| + | Competitive rates compared with US onshore software firms |
| - | Generalist IT company where healthcare is one of many practices |
| - | No hardware, electronics or mechanical design |
| - | FDA and CE experience claims are self-reported |
| Jabil Healthcare | |
|---|---|
| + | One of the largest healthcare manufacturing networks in the world |
| + | FDA-registered sites for finished devices |
| + | Strong supply chain management during component shortages |
| + | Covers drug delivery through the Pii acquisition |
| - | Built for production volume; early design and invention are outside its main business |
| - | Small companies may struggle to get attention |
| - | Engineering support is tied to manufacturing programs |
Who should choose ScienceSoft?
A typical fit: SaMD for clinical decision support.
Large, ISO 13485 certified software team with healthcare analytics and testing services. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Digital health, Diagnostics & lab devices, Wearables & remote monitoring, Financial services.
Who should choose Jabil Healthcare?
A typical fit: scaling production of a cleared diabetes device.
Global scale, supply chain and FDA-registered production for established medical device brands. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery, Wearables & remote monitoring, Consumer health.
Decision matrix: ScienceSoft vs Jabil Healthcare
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | ScienceSoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | ScienceSoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: ScienceSoft (Not disclosed) vs Jabil Healthcare (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | ScienceSoft |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: ScienceSoft vs Jabil Healthcare
| Use case | ScienceSoft fit | Jabil Healthcare fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaMD for clinical decision support | Strong | Limited | ScienceSoft |
| Mobile companion app for an existing device | Strong | Limited | ScienceSoft |
| Scaling production of a cleared diabetes device | Limited | Strong | Jabil Healthcare |
| Global manufacturing of a surgical robotics subsystem | Limited | Strong | Jabil Healthcare |
Verdict: ScienceSoft vs Jabil Healthcare
ScienceSoft (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Medical Device Development projects. Large, ISO 13485 certified software team with healthcare analytics and testing services.
Jabil Healthcare (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need global manufacturing of a surgical robotics subsystem. If your situation matches that, Jabil Healthcare is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
ScienceSoft vs Jabil Healthcare FAQ
Is ScienceSoft better than Jabil Healthcare?
ScienceSoft (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. ScienceSoft's strongest advantage: ISO 13485 certification covers medical device software and SaMD. Jabil Healthcare's strongest advantage: one of the largest healthcare manufacturing networks in the world.
How do ScienceSoft and Jabil Healthcare differ in pricing?
ScienceSoft uses fixed project, time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Jabil Healthcare uses manufacturing supply agreement, npi contract pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: ScienceSoft or Jabil Healthcare?
ScienceSoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between ScienceSoft and Jabil Healthcare?
ScienceSoft's primary differentiator is: Large, ISO 13485 certified software team with healthcare analytics and testing services. Jabil Healthcare's primary differentiator is: global scale, supply chain and FDA-registered production for established medical device brands. They also differ in team size (700–800 vs ~20,000 (healthcare)), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Digital health, Diagnostics & lab devices vs Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.