TTP
Employee-owned Cambridgeshire consultancy with a long medical devices practice in drug delivery, surgical and diagnostics
Founded 1987 | Melbourn, Cambridgeshire, UK | Not published employees
mechanicalelectronicsfirmwaredrug-deliverydiagnosticsregulatory
What is TTP?
TTP (The Technology Partnership) has operated for around 40 years from its own science park in Melbourn, South Cambridgeshire. In December 2021 TTP Group moved to 100% employee ownership through an Employee Ownership Trust. Its Medical Devices team works on drug delivery, surgical systems and diagnostics, and the wider company does deep technology work in sectors such as life science instruments and industrial products. Headcount is not published in a form we could verify.
TTP works primarily with clients in Drug delivery, Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Employee ownership plus long-running drug delivery and surgical device work for large pharma and medtech clients.
TTP tech stack and services
UltrasoundMicrofluidicsEmbedded C/C++Mechanical simulationISO 13485 QMS
| Service area |
|---|
| Mechanical Engineering |
| Electronics & PCB Design |
| Firmware & Embedded Software |
| Drug Delivery Devices |
| Diagnostics & Lab Instruments |
| Regulatory & QMS Support |
TTP pricing
Short answer: TTP uses a time and materials, phased fixed project pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Consulting | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Fixed project | From not disclosed | Well-defined scope |
| Time & materials | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
TTP does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
TTP pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Employee ownership since 2021 removes pressure from outside investors | -Does not publish headcount or rates, which makes early budgeting harder |
| +Well regarded for drug delivery devices, an area where mechanics and human factors decide success | -UK-centric delivery; US clients work across time zones |
| +Own science park with lab and workshop space for physical prototyping | -Pricing sits with the premium Cambridge consultancies |
| +Specialist depth in ultrasound and fluidics |
TTP vs alternatives
How TTP compares to the other top Medical Device Development companies.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lemberg Solutions | Connected and smart medical devices, one engineering team. | Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| StarFish Medical | Startups needing design plus pilot manufacturing. | Medtech-only practice that can build clinical and early commercial units in its own certified clean room | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Sunrise Labs | Electromechanical devices, fluidics and infusion. | Three decades of work on pumps, fluidics and motion-heavy medical systems where mechanics and firmware are tightly coupled | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Velentium | Implantables and FDA cybersecurity submissions. | Combines active-implantable engineering with a dedicated device cybersecurity team that prepares FDA premarket security documentation | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Cambridge Consultants | Novel technology with high technical risk. | Physicists, chemists and engineers working in one building on problems no off-the-shelf design can solve | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Zühlke | European medtech firms modernizing device software. | A device engineering practice and a large digital practice under one owner, useful when a device program is really a platform program | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| MedAcuity | Device makers with hardware but no software team. | US-based, ISO 13485 certified team that does nothing but regulated device software | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Key Tech | IVD instruments with consumables. | Designs the diagnostic instrument and its cartridge together, with human factors in the same studio | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Team Consulting | Inhalers, injectors and human-factors-heavy devices. | Three decades of medical-only industrial design and human factors, especially for drug delivery | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Minnetronix Medical | Electronic devices from design into US production. | Develops and then manufactures electronic medical devices in the same Minnesota medtech cluster | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Planet Innovation | Diagnostics companies in Asia-Pacific and the US. | Diagnostics roots plus product and commercialization experience in Australia and the US | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Orthogonal | SaMD and device companion apps. | Agile delivery adapted to FDA-regulated software, focused on the app and cloud side of connected devices | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| S3 Connected Health | Pharma companies adding connectivity to drug delivery. | Combines embedded wireless engineering with patient-facing apps and data platforms for pharma programs | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Veranex | Device design plus clinical trials and reimbursement. | One contract can cover engineering, clinical studies, regulatory strategy and reimbursement | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Sagentia Innovation | Surgical robotics and combination products. | Medical development backed by a listed science group that also runs a regulatory consultancy | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Bluefruit Software | UK device makers outsourcing firmware and testing. | Small, employee-owned embedded team with medical devices as its largest market and a strong testing culture | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Promenade Software | Small device makers needing software and security. | Pairs contract device software with its own medical cybersecurity tooling and information-sharing service | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) | Touchscreen user interfaces on medical devices. | Qt and embedded UI depth applied to regulated device software, including on QNX | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Delve | User research and industrial design for medtech. | Design research and industrial design depth from two long-established US studios | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Kaleidoscope Innovation | Enterprises already working with Infosys. | US medical design studio with access to Infosys engineering and digital capacity | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Product Creation Studio | Pacific Northwest startups and lab instruments. | Small ISO 13485 studio that can follow its own quality system or the client's | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Simbex | Sensor wearables and biomechanics research. | Biomechanics and sensor research background applied to wearable health devices | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Softeq | Connected devices needing hardware plus apps. | Hardware, firmware, mobile and cloud teams in one company, with ISO 13485 in place | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| ScienceSoft | SaMD and device software on a budget. | Large, ISO 13485 certified software team with healthcare analytics and testing services | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Tata Elxsi | Large medtech firms offshoring sustaining engineering. | Offshore scale for verification, documentation and sustaining work on existing device portfolios | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Phillips-Medisize | Drug delivery devices needing high-volume production. | Design, molding and assembly of drug delivery devices under one global quality system | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Jabil Healthcare | Global production capacity for cleared devices. | Global scale, supply chain and FDA-registered production for established medical device brands | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Flex Health Solutions | Design transfer into global contract manufacturing. | Dedicated NPI center and design sites that feed directly into Flex's medical manufacturing network | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Plexus | Complex capital equipment needing build and sustaining. | Engineering, NPI and sustaining services for low-to-mid volume, high-complexity medical equipment | 3.8 | Full comparison |
TTP FAQ
What is TTP?
Employee-owned Cambridgeshire consultancy with a long medical devices practice in drug delivery, surgical and diagnostics
How much does TTP charge?
TTP uses time and materials, phased fixed project pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does TTP use?
TTP works with Ultrasound, Microfluidics, Embedded C/C++, Mechanical simulation, ISO 13485 QMS. Primary industries served include Drug delivery, Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices.
Is TTP right for enterprise?
Pharma device programs, inhalers and injectors. Not published team size. Key consideration: Does not publish headcount or rates, which makes early budgeting harder.
What are the best TTP alternatives?
The best alternatives to TTP depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Lemberg Solutions: owns pcb design, firmware, embedded linux, iot backend and edge ai under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together
- StarFish Medical: medtech-only practice that can build clinical and early commercial units in its own certified clean room
- Sunrise Labs: three decades of work on pumps, fluidics and motion-heavy medical systems where mechanics and firmware are tightly coupled
Compare TTP with other Medical Device Development companies
TTP vs Lemberg Solutions TTP vs StarFish Medical TTP vs Sunrise Labs TTP vs Velentium TTP vs Cambridge Consultants TTP vs Zühlke TTP vs MedAcuity TTP vs Key Tech TTP vs Team Consulting TTP vs Minnetronix Medical TTP vs Planet Innovation TTP vs Orthogonal TTP vs S3 Connected Health TTP vs Veranex TTP vs Sagentia Innovation TTP vs Bluefruit Software TTP vs Promenade Software TTP vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) TTP vs Delve TTP vs Kaleidoscope Innovation TTP vs Product Creation Studio TTP vs Simbex TTP vs Softeq TTP vs ScienceSoft TTP vs Tata Elxsi TTP vs Phillips-Medisize TTP vs Jabil Healthcare TTP vs Flex Health Solutions TTP vs Plexus
Verify all details directly with TTP before making a decision.