Simbex
New Hampshire design and research firm for medtech, health tech and sports technology, owned by Riddell
Founded 2000 | Lebanon, NH, USA | 11–100 employees
industrial-designmechanicalelectronicsfirmwareconnected-iot
What is Simbex?
Simbex was founded in 2000 in Lebanon, New Hampshire, and works on product design, applied research and commercialization in medtech, health tech and sports technology. Riddell, the American football helmet maker and a long-time client, acquired it in April 2024. Its medical work includes RestEaze, a remote monitoring device for sleep disorder diagnosis built with Tanzen Medical, and fall-detection wearables. Team size estimates range from 11 to 100.
Simbex works primarily with clients in Wearables & remote monitoring, Sports technology, Digital health sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Biomechanics and sensor research background applied to wearable health devices.
Simbex tech stack and services
BLEEmbedded C/C++Sensor fusionMobile appsSolidWorks
| Service area |
|---|
| Industrial Design & Human Factors |
| Mechanical Engineering |
| Electronics & PCB Design |
| Firmware & Embedded Software |
| Connected Devices & IoT |
Simbex pricing
Short answer: Simbex uses a time and materials, fixed project pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed project | From not disclosed | Well-defined scope |
| Time & materials | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
Simbex does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
Simbex pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Strong sensor and biomechanics research skills | -Owned by Riddell since April 2024, so sports technology may take priority over medical clients |
| +Experience with wearable monitoring devices | -Small team |
| +Covers design through commercialization planning | -Fewer regulated Class II and III device credits than medtech-only firms |
| +Small team with direct access to principals |
Simbex vs alternatives
How Simbex compares to the other top Medical Device Development companies.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lemberg Solutions | Connected and smart medical devices, one engineering team. | Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| StarFish Medical | Startups needing design plus pilot manufacturing. | Medtech-only practice that can build clinical and early commercial units in its own certified clean room | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Sunrise Labs | Electromechanical devices, fluidics and infusion. | Three decades of work on pumps, fluidics and motion-heavy medical systems where mechanics and firmware are tightly coupled | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Velentium | Implantables and FDA cybersecurity submissions. | Combines active-implantable engineering with a dedicated device cybersecurity team that prepares FDA premarket security documentation | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Cambridge Consultants | Novel technology with high technical risk. | Physicists, chemists and engineers working in one building on problems no off-the-shelf design can solve | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| TTP | Pharma device programs, inhalers and injectors. | Employee ownership plus long-running drug delivery and surgical device work for large pharma and medtech clients | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Zühlke | European medtech firms modernizing device software. | A device engineering practice and a large digital practice under one owner, useful when a device program is really a platform program | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| MedAcuity | Device makers with hardware but no software team. | US-based, ISO 13485 certified team that does nothing but regulated device software | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Key Tech | IVD instruments with consumables. | Designs the diagnostic instrument and its cartridge together, with human factors in the same studio | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Team Consulting | Inhalers, injectors and human-factors-heavy devices. | Three decades of medical-only industrial design and human factors, especially for drug delivery | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Minnetronix Medical | Electronic devices from design into US production. | Develops and then manufactures electronic medical devices in the same Minnesota medtech cluster | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Planet Innovation | Diagnostics companies in Asia-Pacific and the US. | Diagnostics roots plus product and commercialization experience in Australia and the US | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Orthogonal | SaMD and device companion apps. | Agile delivery adapted to FDA-regulated software, focused on the app and cloud side of connected devices | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| S3 Connected Health | Pharma companies adding connectivity to drug delivery. | Combines embedded wireless engineering with patient-facing apps and data platforms for pharma programs | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Veranex | Device design plus clinical trials and reimbursement. | One contract can cover engineering, clinical studies, regulatory strategy and reimbursement | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Sagentia Innovation | Surgical robotics and combination products. | Medical development backed by a listed science group that also runs a regulatory consultancy | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Bluefruit Software | UK device makers outsourcing firmware and testing. | Small, employee-owned embedded team with medical devices as its largest market and a strong testing culture | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Promenade Software | Small device makers needing software and security. | Pairs contract device software with its own medical cybersecurity tooling and information-sharing service | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) | Touchscreen user interfaces on medical devices. | Qt and embedded UI depth applied to regulated device software, including on QNX | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Delve | User research and industrial design for medtech. | Design research and industrial design depth from two long-established US studios | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Kaleidoscope Innovation | Enterprises already working with Infosys. | US medical design studio with access to Infosys engineering and digital capacity | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Product Creation Studio | Pacific Northwest startups and lab instruments. | Small ISO 13485 studio that can follow its own quality system or the client's | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Softeq | Connected devices needing hardware plus apps. | Hardware, firmware, mobile and cloud teams in one company, with ISO 13485 in place | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| ScienceSoft | SaMD and device software on a budget. | Large, ISO 13485 certified software team with healthcare analytics and testing services | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Tata Elxsi | Large medtech firms offshoring sustaining engineering. | Offshore scale for verification, documentation and sustaining work on existing device portfolios | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Phillips-Medisize | Drug delivery devices needing high-volume production. | Design, molding and assembly of drug delivery devices under one global quality system | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Jabil Healthcare | Global production capacity for cleared devices. | Global scale, supply chain and FDA-registered production for established medical device brands | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Flex Health Solutions | Design transfer into global contract manufacturing. | Dedicated NPI center and design sites that feed directly into Flex's medical manufacturing network | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Plexus | Complex capital equipment needing build and sustaining. | Engineering, NPI and sustaining services for low-to-mid volume, high-complexity medical equipment | 3.8 | Full comparison |
Simbex FAQ
What is Simbex?
New Hampshire design and research firm for medtech, health tech and sports technology, owned by Riddell
How much does Simbex charge?
Simbex uses time and materials, fixed project pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does Simbex use?
Simbex works with BLE, Embedded C/C++, Sensor fusion, Mobile apps, SolidWorks. Primary industries served include Wearables & remote monitoring, Sports technology, Digital health.
Is Simbex right for enterprise?
Sensor wearables and biomechanics research. 11–100 team size. Key consideration: Owned by Riddell since April 2024, so sports technology may take priority over medical clients.
What are the best Simbex alternatives?
The best alternatives to Simbex depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Lemberg Solutions: owns pcb design, firmware, embedded linux, iot backend and edge ai under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together
- StarFish Medical: medtech-only practice that can build clinical and early commercial units in its own certified clean room
- Sunrise Labs: three decades of work on pumps, fluidics and motion-heavy medical systems where mechanics and firmware are tightly coupled
Compare Simbex with other Medical Device Development companies
Simbex vs Lemberg Solutions Simbex vs StarFish Medical Simbex vs Sunrise Labs Simbex vs Velentium Simbex vs Cambridge Consultants Simbex vs TTP Simbex vs Zühlke Simbex vs MedAcuity Simbex vs Key Tech Simbex vs Team Consulting Simbex vs Minnetronix Medical Simbex vs Planet Innovation Simbex vs Orthogonal Simbex vs S3 Connected Health Simbex vs Veranex Simbex vs Sagentia Innovation Simbex vs Bluefruit Software Simbex vs Promenade Software Simbex vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) Simbex vs Delve Simbex vs Kaleidoscope Innovation Simbex vs Product Creation Studio Simbex vs Softeq Simbex vs ScienceSoft Simbex vs Tata Elxsi Simbex vs Phillips-Medisize Simbex vs Jabil Healthcare Simbex vs Flex Health Solutions Simbex vs Plexus
Verify all details directly with Simbex before making a decision.