Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Cambridge Consultants (4.4/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected and smart medical devices, one engineering team. Cambridge Consultants is the stronger option for novel technology with high technical risk. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Cambridge Consultants |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1960 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Cambridge, UK (part of Capgemini) |
| Team size | 200+ | 900+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together | Physicists, chemists and engineers working in one building on problems no off-the-shelf design can solve |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, phased fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux, RTOS, FPGA | Optics & photonics, RF, Embedded C/C++ |
| Industries served | Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices, Digital health, Automotive, Energy, Logistics | Diagnostics & lab devices, Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery, Digital health |
Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Founded in 2007, Lemberg Solutions builds both hardware and software, and has offices in Lviv, Hamburg, London and Kraków. For medical device teams it covers electrical engineering, firmware, RTOS and embedded Linux development, FPGA programming, GUI work, connectivity and IoT, edge AI and cybersecurity, so one vendor can own the device electronics, its embedded code and the cloud or mobile side that talks to it. Healthcare is one of its core industries alongside automotive, energy and logistics, and named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Ferno, Cellink and Bosch Rexroth. The company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification and runs its own hardware lab. It does not manufacture finished devices at volume and does not obtain regulatory clearance on a client's behalf; it supplies the engineering documentation the client's regulatory team needs.
Cambridge Consultants
Cambridge Consultants has done contract research and product development from Cambridge, UK, since 1960. It became part of Capgemini through the 2020 acquisition of Altran and now sits within Capgemini Invent, with a headcount of about 900 to 1,000. Medical and life sciences is one of its main sectors, and its public work includes the optics behind Ellume's FDA-authorized COVID-19 home test. Projects tend to involve new sensing, surgical robotics, drug delivery or diagnostics technology rather than incremental redesigns.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Cambridge Consultants |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| SaMD & companion apps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connected devices & IoT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Industrial design & human factors | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mechanical engineering | ✗ | ✓ |
| Device cybersecurity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Regulatory & QMS support | ✗ | ✓ |
| Manufacturing & scale-up | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Cambridge Consultants |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C/C++ | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| Cloud (AWS/Azure) | ✓ | N/A |
| IEC 62304 | N/A | N/A |
| ISO 14971 | N/A | N/A |
| ISO 13485 QMS | N/A | ✓ |
| Qt | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Cambridge Consultants |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time & materials | Consulting, Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Cambridge Consultants |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices, Digital health | Diagnostics & lab devices, Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery |
| Best use cases | Building a connected wearable or home-monitoring device with a companion app and cloud backend, Adding edge AI or computer vision to an existing diagnostic instrument | Feasibility of a new sensing method for a point-of-care diagnostic, Early-stage surgical robotics architecture |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Consulting |
Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | A single team covers electronics, firmware, cloud, data and AI, which cuts the hand-offs that usually slow connected-device programs |
| + | Partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics give early access to silicon support and reference designs |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, with security designed into the product rather than bolted on before release |
| + | In-house electronics lab shortens prototype loops and lowers R&D risk before a design freeze |
| + | All intellectual property transfers to the client, and the cooperation model can be consulting, team extension or full product development |
| + | Practical edge AI and computer vision experience for devices that need on-board inference |
| - | No in-house mass production, so a separate contract manufacturer is needed once the design is ready to scale |
| - | Does not obtain FDA or CE certification for clients; it provides technical documentation and engineering support for the client's own submission |
| - | Not ISO 13485 certified per the information reviewed, so buyers should confirm how it works inside their own medical QMS |
| Cambridge Consultants | |
|---|---|
| + | Rare breadth of science and engineering disciplines for early, risky technology work |
| + | Public medtech credits such as the Ellume home-test optics |
| + | Backing of Capgemini gives access to digital and manufacturing partners for later phases |
| + | Strong at feasibility studies that tell you whether an idea can work before you fund a full program |
| - | Owned by Capgemini since 2020, so pricing and processes follow a large-group model |
| - | Among the most expensive options on this list; small startups often find the minimum budget too high |
| - | Best at invention and early development; routine sustaining engineering is not where it adds most value |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: building a connected wearable or home-monitoring device with a companion app and cloud backend.
Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices, Digital health, Automotive, Energy, Logistics.
Who should choose Cambridge Consultants?
A typical fit: feasibility of a new sensing method for a point-of-care diagnostic.
Physicists, chemists and engineers working in one building on problems no off-the-shelf design can solve. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Diagnostics & lab devices, Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery, Digital health.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Cambridge Consultants (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Cambridge Consultants fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a connected wearable or home-monitoring device with a companion app and cloud backend | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Adding edge AI or computer vision to an existing diagnostic instrument | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Feasibility of a new sensing method for a point-of-care diagnostic | Limited | Strong | Cambridge Consultants |
| Early-stage surgical robotics architecture | Limited | Strong | Cambridge Consultants |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Medical Device Development projects. Owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together.
Cambridge Consultants (4.4/5) is worth a look if you need early-stage surgical robotics architecture. If your situation matches that, Cambridge Consultants is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Cambridge Consultants?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: a single team covers electronics, firmware, cloud, data and AI, which cuts the hand-offs that usually slow connected-device programs. Cambridge Consultants's strongest advantage: rare breadth of science and engineering disciplines for early, risky technology work.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Cambridge Consultants differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses fixed project, time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Cambridge Consultants uses time and materials, phased fixed project pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Cambridge Consultants?
Cambridge Consultants is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Cambridge Consultants?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: owns PCB design, firmware, embedded Linux, IoT backend and edge AI under one roof, so device and cloud are designed together. Cambridge Consultants's primary differentiator is: Physicists, chemists and engineers working in one building on problems no off-the-shelf design can solve. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 900+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Wearables & remote monitoring, Diagnostics & lab devices vs Diagnostics & lab devices, Surgical & robotics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.