Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) vs Jabil Healthcare: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) (4.0/5) edges ahead of Jabil Healthcare (3.8/5) overall. Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) is the better choice for touchscreen user interfaces on medical devices. Jabil Healthcare is the stronger option for global production capacity for cleared devices. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) vs Jabil Healthcare: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1987 | 1966 |
| HQ | Waltham, MA, USA | St. Petersburg, FL, USA |
| Team size | Not published | ~20,000 (healthcare) |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Qt and embedded UI depth applied to regulated device software, including on QNX | Global scale, supply chain and FDA-registered production for established medical device brands |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed project | Manufacturing supply agreement, NPI contract |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Qt, QNX, Embedded Linux | Injection molding, Automated assembly, PCB assembly |
| Industries served | Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices, Industrial, Automotive | Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery, Wearables & remote monitoring, Consumer health |
Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) vs Jabil Healthcare: overview
Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)
Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) has worked in software since 1987 and is headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts, with offices in Sunnyvale and Ottawa. It describes itself as the largest independent source of Qt expertise in North America and runs a dedicated medtech practice for regulated device development (per company website; independently unverifiable). Since 2019 it has partnered with BlackBerry QNX for safety-critical medical work. ICS does not publish its headcount.
Jabil Healthcare
Jabil Healthcare was formed in 2020 when Jabil combined its Nypro business with its orthopedics, spine and trauma units. At launch it had nearly 20,000 employees and more than 35 sites, and its factories producing finished medical devices are FDA registered. It covers minimally invasive devices, surgical robotics, complex catheters, diabetes care and consumer health, and the acquisition of CDMO Pii extended it into drug development and aseptic fill-finish. Jabil reported $8.3 billion in company-wide revenue for its second fiscal quarter of 2026.
Services and capabilities: Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) vs Jabil Healthcare
| Capability | Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✗ |
| SaMD & companion apps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connected devices & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Industrial design & human factors | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mechanical engineering | ✗ | ✓ |
| Device cybersecurity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Regulatory & QMS support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Manufacturing & scale-up | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) vs Jabil Healthcare
| Framework / platform | Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C/C++ | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| Cloud (AWS/Azure) | ✓ | N/A |
| IEC 62304 | ✓ | N/A |
| ISO 14971 | N/A | N/A |
| ISO 13485 QMS | N/A | ✓ |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) vs Jabil Healthcare
| Criterion | Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time & materials | Manufacturing contract |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) vs Jabil Healthcare
| Dimension | Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) | Jabil Healthcare |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices, Industrial | Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery, Wearables & remote monitoring |
| Best use cases | Designing and coding the touchscreen for a surgical console, Porting device software to Qt 6 on embedded Linux | Scaling production of a cleared diabetes device, Global manufacturing of a surgical robotics subsystem |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Manufacturing contract |
Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) vs Jabil Healthcare: pros and cons
| Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) | |
|---|---|
| + | One of the deepest Qt benches in North America, useful for device GUIs |
| + | QNX partnership for safety-critical medical operating systems |
| + | Also offers device cybersecurity and regulatory support |
| + | Long history and US-based teams |
| - | Medtech is one practice among several industries |
| - | Not a hardware design firm |
| - | Headcount and certifications are not published |
| Jabil Healthcare | |
|---|---|
| + | One of the largest healthcare manufacturing networks in the world |
| + | FDA-registered sites for finished devices |
| + | Strong supply chain management during component shortages |
| + | Covers drug delivery through the Pii acquisition |
| - | Built for production volume; early design and invention are outside its main business |
| - | Small companies may struggle to get attention |
| - | Engineering support is tied to manufacturing programs |
Who should choose Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)?
A typical fit: designing and coding the touchscreen for a surgical console.
Qt and embedded UI depth applied to regulated device software, including on QNX. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices, Industrial, Automotive.
Who should choose Jabil Healthcare?
A typical fit: scaling production of a cleared diabetes device.
Global scale, supply chain and FDA-registered production for established medical device brands. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery, Wearables & remote monitoring, Consumer health.
Decision matrix: Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) vs Jabil Healthcare
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) (Not disclosed) vs Jabil Healthcare (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) vs Jabil Healthcare
| Use case | Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) fit | Jabil Healthcare fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Designing and coding the touchscreen for a surgical console | Strong | Limited | Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) |
| Porting device software to Qt 6 on embedded Linux | Strong | Limited | Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) |
| Scaling production of a cleared diabetes device | Limited | Strong | Jabil Healthcare |
| Global manufacturing of a surgical robotics subsystem | Limited | Strong | Jabil Healthcare |
Verdict: Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) vs Jabil Healthcare
Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Medical Device Development projects. Qt and embedded UI depth applied to regulated device software, including on QNX.
Jabil Healthcare (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need global manufacturing of a surgical robotics subsystem. If your situation matches that, Jabil Healthcare is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) vs Jabil Healthcare FAQ
Is Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) better than Jabil Healthcare?
Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)'s strongest advantage: one of the deepest Qt benches in North America, useful for device GUIs. Jabil Healthcare's strongest advantage: one of the largest healthcare manufacturing networks in the world.
How do Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) and Jabil Healthcare differ in pricing?
Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) uses time and materials, fixed project pricing. Jabil Healthcare uses manufacturing supply agreement, npi contract pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) or Jabil Healthcare?
Jabil Healthcare is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) and Jabil Healthcare?
Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)'s primary differentiator is: qt and embedded UI depth applied to regulated device software, including on QNX. Jabil Healthcare's primary differentiator is: global scale, supply chain and FDA-registered production for established medical device brands. They also differ in team size (Not published vs ~20,000 (healthcare)), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices vs Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.