Best Medical Device Development Companies

Flex Health Solutions vs Plexus: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Flex Health Solutions (3.8/5) edges ahead of Plexus (3.8/5) overall. Flex Health Solutions is the better choice for design transfer into global contract manufacturing. Plexus is the stronger option for complex capital equipment needing build and sustaining. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Flex Health Solutions vs Plexus: head-to-head summary

Criterion Flex Health Solutions Plexus
Founded 1969 1979
HQ Austin, TX, USA / Singapore Neenah, WI, USA
Team size Large (Flex Ltd.) ~20,000
Rating 3.8 / 5 3.8 / 5
Primary differentiator Dedicated NPI center and design sites that feed directly into Flex's medical manufacturing network Engineering, NPI and sustaining services for low-to-mid volume, high-complexity medical equipment
Pricing model Manufacturing supply agreement, NPI contract NPI contract, manufacturing supply agreement
Min. engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Primary tech stack PCB assembly, Injection molding, Automated assembly PCB design, PCB assembly, Embedded C/C++
Industries served Drug delivery, Diagnostics & lab devices, Surgical & therapeutic devices Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices, Aerospace, Industrial

Flex Health Solutions vs Plexus: overview

Flex Health Solutions

Flex Health Solutions is the healthcare division of Flex Ltd. and operates as a contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO) for medical devices and pharma. Flex lists 26 manufacturing sites, six design and engineering sites, 16 FDA-registered entities and 21 ISO 13485 sites for health (per company website; independently unverifiable). In 2025 it opened a North American new product introduction (NPI) center for healthcare customers, and it shared a 2025 PDA Drug Delivery Innovation Award with Merck KGaA for an autoinjector.

Plexus

Plexus Corp. is a NASDAQ-listed company headquartered in Neenah, Wisconsin, that offers design and development, supply chain, new product introduction, manufacturing and sustaining services. Healthcare and life sciences is one of its three markets alongside aerospace and defense and industrial. Its healthcare work includes surgical equipment, imaging equipment and diagnostic instruments. The company has around 20,000 employees in total, though only part of that is healthcare.

Services and capabilities: Flex Health Solutions vs Plexus

Capability Flex Health Solutions Plexus
Electronics & PCB design ✓ ✓
Firmware & embedded software ✗ ✗
SaMD & companion apps ✗ ✗
Connected devices & IoT ✗ ✗
Industrial design & human factors ✗ ✗
Mechanical engineering ✓ ✓
Device cybersecurity ✗ ✗
Regulatory & QMS support ✓ ✓
Manufacturing & scale-up ✓ ✓

Tech stack comparison: Flex Health Solutions vs Plexus

Framework / platform Flex Health Solutions Plexus
Embedded C/C++ N/A ✓
Embedded Linux N/A N/A
RTOS N/A N/A
BLE N/A N/A
Cloud (AWS/Azure) N/A N/A
IEC 62304 N/A N/A
ISO 14971 N/A N/A
ISO 13485 QMS ✓ ✓
Qt N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Flex Health Solutions vs Plexus

Criterion Flex Health Solutions Plexus
Minimum engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Engagement models Fixed project, Manufacturing contract Fixed project, Manufacturing contract
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Flex Health Solutions vs Plexus

Dimension Flex Health Solutions Plexus
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Drug delivery, Diagnostics & lab devices, Surgical & therapeutic devices Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices, Aerospace
Best use cases Transferring a verified design into volume production, Pre-clinical and design verification builds Building and sustaining a diagnostic imaging subsystem, Electronics redesign for component obsolescence
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Flex Health Solutions vs Plexus: pros and cons

Flex Health Solutions
+ Large global network of ISO 13485 and FDA-registered sites
+ New NPI center supports prototype builds, design verification and production transfer
+ Award-winning drug delivery work with Merck KGaA
+ Handles sterilization and packaging in-house
- Development work mainly exists to feed programs into Flex factories
- Better for funded programs with a clear path to volume
- Site counts are company-reported and differ across Flex pages
Plexus
+ Strong with complex, lower-volume capital equipment such as imaging and surgical systems
+ Offers product engineering as well as manufacturing
+ Sustaining engineering over long product lives
+ Public company with transparent financial reporting
- Generalist manufacturer; healthcare competes with aerospace and industrial for capacity
- Not a fit for early-stage concept work
- Most engineering engagements lead toward a manufacturing contract

Who should choose Flex Health Solutions?

A typical fit: transferring a verified design into volume production.

Dedicated NPI center and design sites that feed directly into Flex's medical manufacturing network. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Drug delivery, Diagnostics & lab devices, Surgical & therapeutic devices.

Who should choose Plexus?

A typical fit: building and sustaining a diagnostic imaging subsystem.

Engineering, NPI and sustaining services for low-to-mid volume, high-complexity medical equipment. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices, Aerospace, Industrial.

Decision matrix: Flex Health Solutions vs Plexus

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Flex Health Solutions
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Check each company's engagement model
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Flex Health Solutions (Not disclosed) vs Plexus (Not disclosed)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Plexus
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Flex Health Solutions vs Plexus

Use case Flex Health Solutions fit Plexus fit Winner
Transferring a verified design into volume production Strong Limited Flex Health Solutions
Pre-clinical and design verification builds Strong Limited Flex Health Solutions
Building and sustaining a diagnostic imaging subsystem Limited Strong Plexus
Electronics redesign for component obsolescence Limited Strong Plexus

Verdict: Flex Health Solutions vs Plexus

Flex Health Solutions (3.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Medical Device Development projects. Dedicated NPI center and design sites that feed directly into Flex's medical manufacturing network.

Plexus (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need electronics redesign for component obsolescence. If your situation matches that, Plexus is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Flex Health Solutions vs Plexus FAQ

Is Flex Health Solutions better than Plexus?

Flex Health Solutions (3.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Flex Health Solutions's strongest advantage: large global network of ISO 13485 and FDA-registered sites. Plexus's strongest advantage: strong with complex, lower-volume capital equipment such as imaging and surgical systems.

How do Flex Health Solutions and Plexus differ in pricing?

Flex Health Solutions uses manufacturing supply agreement, npi contract pricing. Plexus uses npi contract, manufacturing supply agreement pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Flex Health Solutions or Plexus?

Plexus is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Flex Health Solutions and Plexus?

Flex Health Solutions's primary differentiator is: dedicated NPI center and design sites that feed directly into Flex's medical manufacturing network. Plexus's primary differentiator is: Engineering, NPI and sustaining services for low-to-mid volume, high-complexity medical equipment. They also differ in team size (Large (Flex Ltd.) vs ~20,000), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Drug delivery, Diagnostics & lab devices vs Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.