Best Medical Device Development Companies

Cambridge Consultants vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS): full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Cambridge Consultants (4.4/5) edges ahead of Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) (4.0/5) overall. Cambridge Consultants is the better choice for novel technology with high technical risk. Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) is the stronger option for touchscreen user interfaces on medical devices. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Cambridge Consultants vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS): head-to-head summary

Criterion Cambridge Consultants Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)
Founded 1960 1987
HQ Cambridge, UK (part of Capgemini) Waltham, MA, USA
Team size 900+ Not published
Rating 4.4 / 5 4.0 / 5
Primary differentiator Physicists, chemists and engineers working in one building on problems no off-the-shelf design can solve Qt and embedded UI depth applied to regulated device software, including on QNX
Pricing model Time and materials, phased fixed project Time and materials, fixed project
Min. engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Primary tech stack Optics & photonics, RF, Embedded C/C++ Qt, QNX, Embedded Linux
Industries served Diagnostics & lab devices, Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery, Digital health Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices, Industrial, Automotive

Cambridge Consultants vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS): overview

Cambridge Consultants

Cambridge Consultants has done contract research and product development from Cambridge, UK, since 1960. It became part of Capgemini through the 2020 acquisition of Altran and now sits within Capgemini Invent, with a headcount of about 900 to 1,000. Medical and life sciences is one of its main sectors, and its public work includes the optics behind Ellume's FDA-authorized COVID-19 home test. Projects tend to involve new sensing, surgical robotics, drug delivery or diagnostics technology rather than incremental redesigns.

Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)

Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) has worked in software since 1987 and is headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts, with offices in Sunnyvale and Ottawa. It describes itself as the largest independent source of Qt expertise in North America and runs a dedicated medtech practice for regulated device development (per company website; independently unverifiable). Since 2019 it has partnered with BlackBerry QNX for safety-critical medical work. ICS does not publish its headcount.

Services and capabilities: Cambridge Consultants vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)

Capability Cambridge Consultants Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)
Electronics & PCB design ✓ ✗
Firmware & embedded software ✓ ✓
SaMD & companion apps ✗ ✓
Connected devices & IoT ✗ ✗
Industrial design & human factors ✓ ✗
Mechanical engineering ✓ ✗
Device cybersecurity ✗ ✓
Regulatory & QMS support ✓ ✓
Manufacturing & scale-up ✗ ✗

Tech stack comparison: Cambridge Consultants vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)

Framework / platform Cambridge Consultants Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)
Embedded C/C++ ✓ N/A
Embedded Linux N/A ✓
RTOS N/A N/A
BLE N/A N/A
Cloud (AWS/Azure) N/A ✓
IEC 62304 N/A ✓
ISO 14971 N/A N/A
ISO 13485 QMS ✓ N/A
Qt N/A ✓

Pricing comparison: Cambridge Consultants vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)

Criterion Cambridge Consultants Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)
Minimum engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Engagement models Consulting, Fixed project, Time & materials Fixed project, Time & materials
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Cambridge Consultants vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)

Dimension Cambridge Consultants Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Diagnostics & lab devices, Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices, Industrial
Best use cases Feasibility of a new sensing method for a point-of-care diagnostic, Early-stage surgical robotics architecture Designing and coding the touchscreen for a surgical console, Porting device software to Qt 6 on embedded Linux
Typical project type Consulting Fixed project

Cambridge Consultants vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS): pros and cons

Cambridge Consultants
+ Rare breadth of science and engineering disciplines for early, risky technology work
+ Public medtech credits such as the Ellume home-test optics
+ Backing of Capgemini gives access to digital and manufacturing partners for later phases
+ Strong at feasibility studies that tell you whether an idea can work before you fund a full program
- Owned by Capgemini since 2020, so pricing and processes follow a large-group model
- Among the most expensive options on this list; small startups often find the minimum budget too high
- Best at invention and early development; routine sustaining engineering is not where it adds most value
Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)
+ One of the deepest Qt benches in North America, useful for device GUIs
+ QNX partnership for safety-critical medical operating systems
+ Also offers device cybersecurity and regulatory support
+ Long history and US-based teams
- Medtech is one practice among several industries
- Not a hardware design firm
- Headcount and certifications are not published

Who should choose Cambridge Consultants?

A typical fit: feasibility of a new sensing method for a point-of-care diagnostic.

Physicists, chemists and engineers working in one building on problems no off-the-shelf design can solve. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Diagnostics & lab devices, Surgical & robotics, Drug delivery, Digital health.

Who should choose Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)?

A typical fit: designing and coding the touchscreen for a surgical console.

Qt and embedded UI depth applied to regulated device software, including on QNX. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices, Industrial, Automotive.

Decision matrix: Cambridge Consultants vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Cambridge Consultants
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Check each company's engagement model
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Cambridge Consultants (Not disclosed) vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) (Not disclosed)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Cambridge Consultants
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Cambridge Consultants vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)

Use case Cambridge Consultants fit Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) fit Winner
Feasibility of a new sensing method for a point-of-care diagnostic Strong Limited Cambridge Consultants
Early-stage surgical robotics architecture Strong Limited Cambridge Consultants
Designing and coding the touchscreen for a surgical console Limited Strong Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)
Porting device software to Qt 6 on embedded Linux Limited Strong Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)

Verdict: Cambridge Consultants vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)

Cambridge Consultants (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Medical Device Development projects. Physicists, chemists and engineers working in one building on problems no off-the-shelf design can solve.

Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need porting device software to Qt 6 on embedded Linux. If your situation matches that, Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Cambridge Consultants vs Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) FAQ

Is Cambridge Consultants better than Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)?

Cambridge Consultants (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Cambridge Consultants's strongest advantage: rare breadth of science and engineering disciplines for early, risky technology work. Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)'s strongest advantage: one of the deepest Qt benches in North America, useful for device GUIs.

How do Cambridge Consultants and Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) differ in pricing?

Cambridge Consultants uses time and materials, phased fixed project pricing. Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS) uses time and materials, fixed project pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Cambridge Consultants or Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)?

Cambridge Consultants is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Cambridge Consultants and Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)?

Cambridge Consultants's primary differentiator is: Physicists, chemists and engineers working in one building on problems no off-the-shelf design can solve. Integrated Computer Solutions (ICS)'s primary differentiator is: qt and embedded UI depth applied to regulated device software, including on QNX. They also differ in team size (900+ vs Not published), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Diagnostics & lab devices, Surgical & robotics vs Surgical & robotics, Diagnostics & lab devices).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.